Aggressive Parents, Aggressive Children Essay

Growing up, squirts have a lot of influences in their life from goggle box to peers nestlingren will always absorb something. With this being said the biggest influence on a tyke would have to be the throng there with the most- their family. Because this is unarguably true, it would therefore be fair to then assume that parental/ sibling onset could have a big impact on future relationships caused by victimisation. What is aggression one may ask?Aggression is a hostile, injurious, destructive behaviour or outlook especially when caused by frustration. Human development would be every(prenominal)thing that happened from the snatch a child thinks for the first time, then. Sigmund Freud was one psychologist who theorizes that those who have experienced trauma from aggression in the home will often use defense mechanisms to write out unwanted emotions. This leaves a negative effect on the unconscious mind and makes a person act irrationally. By comparing polishs and examining how nature vs. urture, the theme of pies and how the ecological theory all come into play when dealing with the way children treat relationships, it is hoped that one will see that aggression in the home will therefore bakshis to negative relationships for the childs near future. One key question m whatsoever would ask and not for only this topic (but many on the mind in general), would be are these actions and thoughts merely influenced by parents, or are they born with the defect and therefore forced to live with it. The argument of nature vs. nurture is a question that has baffled even the most renowned of psychologists.Both sides have strong supporting arguments therefore coming up with an can answer would be impossible for one to do. In Daenas article, entitled Is Aggressive Behaviour Biologically or Environmentally Based? Daena proposes that aggression is learned. load-bearing(a) herself by linking aggression with Skinners rat, continuing by saying aggression is caused by positive reinforcement (reward). By calming a kid down with a toy, the child would have received the reward, now the child looks if he does this, then another reward should come.One way this could be seen in a household could be when a have cusses after he hurts himself. The child could subconsciously perceive that the pain and expression on the perplex going away shortly after was his reward, therefore the child takes on the habit. This does put some weight on the nurture side because the reward is what causes any outcome. But, Professor Richard Tremblay of the University of Montreal says that We do not need to learn to aggress, but to not aggress. In this indirect argument with the other article mentioned Tremblay suggests that children are aggressive by nature and learn how to control their aggression at around 4 years old. When linking nature or nurture to aggression one must understand that they really cant choose an option and be satisfied with their decision. PIES stand s for the four kinds of development physical, intellectual, emotional, social. When children witness aggression at home almost every kind of development are interrupted. Physical development includes growth of bone muscles, motor skills and feels.Intellectual development includes the maturation of mental process, such as learning, imagination, computer storage and perception. When a child is used to seeing aggression exhibited by their parents, they will associate that violence will many things they see on a quotidian basis. For example the first time the child sees adults mating on television, etc. Their first instinct would usually be to believe that the couple is actually fighting. This shows that what they sense would be different from whats actually happening therefore proving a negative outcome.Emotional development includes the maturation and evolution of emotions, social skills, identity, and morals. If a child grows up witnessing spousal abuse from an early age, and isnt explained that its bad, then would that child not believe that this action is perfectly fine? Seeing the father only do this when hes angry, the child could perceive that beating somebody is an output of anger for them as well. Social development includes the evolution of cognition of how people interact, play, share, take turns, or talk socially.From an early stage if the child sees fighting, it is then safe to assume that their evolution of knowledge based on how people interact will be evolving off of the witnessed negative action seen in the first place (spousal abuse, swearing parents, etc. ). A childs development could be positive or negative based solely on the overall environment the child is living in. One may be lead to believe that aggression is taught by others, and then mirrored by the children whom the aggression will eventually attach itself too. Urie Bronfenbrenners Ecological Theory argues that development is influenced by five environmental systems.The theory iden tifies five environmental systems. The five environmental systems are Microsystem, Mesosystem, Exosystem, Macrosystem, and Chronosystem. The microsystem is the childs immediate surroundings i. e. family, neighborhood and friends. This theory suggests that if the child lives in a damaged microsystem, the childs development could also be damaged. The mesosystem is the connection seen between immediate environments i. e. parents to peers. This directly relates to the topic showing that if a child witnesss abuse, theres a good chance they will mirror it with their peers. Children need people in order to amaze human. It is primarily through observing, playing, and working with others both older and younger than he that a child discovers both what he can do and who he can induce. -Urie Bronfenbrenner (quotes. dictionary. com). This quote can be fitted to the topic of aggression in children because she basically explains that without other humans, we would have no route for our personali ty/identity to take. The Macrosystem describes the culture of the child, anywhere from physical geographic, to wealth in the childs area.Urie suggests that those that are living in lower class are more likely to position crime. It must also be understood that children influenced by their environment is not conclusive. As children in some African regions see violence every daylight but learned to adapt with it as opposed to keeping it bottled up in their head. The final system is the Chronosystem. This monitors patterns of environmental events over time. Non-normative events may have a negative psychological effect, e. g. a recent divorce or death in the family. The change is too drastic for the child to cope with.With witnessed aggression, as it starts to become the normal in the childs life, the child may seek to emulate it later on when the normal aggression is missing. Urie Bronfenbenners theory does weigh in favor of the child learning the aggression because it all seems to ti e into the child feeling a sense of normal. Based on the theory, children will emulate what they see, because if they didnt emulate anything, they would have no guidance in their life. Their identity would be 100% their own. Therefore if aggression is their guide, aggression will be what children emulate.