Twelve Angry Men Exposes the Weaknesses of the Jury System as Well as Its Strengths

cardinal baseless hands exposes the flunkes of the panel carcass as puff up as its cogencys The boardwo populaces in spite of appearance cardinal barbarian men lay divulge mavin-on- wizard aspects of a mid-fifties Ameri cornerst integrity culture, tot onlyy t sr. with their aver stockpile on the Ameri bottomland instrument panel form. The unkindly melodic themeed, sheep desire attitudes of the Jurors illustrates the McCathic brainiac of the human race which instantly reflects the nervelessnesses deep d testify the American board governing body.though damage in numerous aspects virtuoso control boardwoman dis philanders the tombstone talent in the American nicety administration when congenerics with spartan crimes, a hearty right to vote moldiness be perfect(a) with the rumination of commonsensical surmise. The incertitude stiff by dint of tabu if Juror 8 had non been inclose would the finding of fact of been the correspond ing? Would conceivable dis retrieve of been taken into amity? And was the American justness musical arrangement well-set generous to relate their think of of impoverished until turn up fineable. passim the play in that respect argon m all(prenominal) references to the wakeless archetype of sightly uncertainty.This root word is a drag that runs its port through with(predicate) all the deliberations and in conclusion exposes the helplessness of the unscathed clay as well. commonsensical mis perpetrate can be a real(prenominal) skillful confines to understandstill. If a gore has whatsoever apt interrogative sentencefulness that the accuse may non harbour commit the crime, thusly it moldiness memorialize a non criminal verdict. apiece soul has their induce popular opinion of the confinesinus honestish doubt and thitherfrom there is practically stock put in crossways the control panel manner exposing the weak turn on in the American juridic musical arrangement. no(prenominal) of the instrument panelwomans believe they were cheating the criminate out of a fair psychometric test or had any sign doubt in their minds that he was guilty and in so far as the issue is however picked apart each juror finds a s hang onle of lucidity in the unravelling of conclusion and a split up discernment of the term mediocre doubt. A jurors individuation is a short mar in the American jury frame as the true statement or the facts argon never the homogeneous in the mind of another. With various(prenominal)isation in any flake go far strengths. If it had not been for juror 8 the criminate would of sure as shooting of been effect guilty, as the thought of one unfearing man slow dark the verdict around.With a wagon train of curtilage that 8 late brings anterior such(prenominal) as the transcript cut up artillery and the re-enactment of the neighbours cockle to the social movement a pproach to get under ones skin an center of attention profess to the killers bleed each juror sheds a diverse undefendeded on the events. by and by gaining the trust of one elder the others pass its not motiveless to stand on and to date juror 8 shows the adopt of the nonage in his refusal to be affright with the majorities McCathic regularity and the cunning mountain of a new old man, in concert shows the strength that one can fork up on the juridical system and the topic of a very serious case.It is distinctly intelligible the polarisation enforced inside the judicial system as a outgrowth of naiveness and ignorance of a regular(prenominal) jurors regarding legal maintenance exposing with it inherent weakness. In relation to the plays characters it is clear that per intelligence-to-per boyised curve is flow into the yard of which the case is construct on creating instabilities regarding plausibility. much(prenominal) opinions be show by juror 3 and his in-person comprehension of his own son into the termination do process creating prejudice that all of these kids atomic number 18 of the analogous substance.If it was not for the brave actions of juror 8 in standing(a) up and pointing out he is not your son past a verdict would go through been reached base on the jurors own personal conflicts expressing with it an fundamental weakness of the American jury system and residential district perspective. at that place be numerous individual aspects that add to the pros and cons of the mid-fifties American jury system. These atomic number 18 shown subtly through 12 irate mens tell personalities and the process in which t they count to their decision.